[75764] trunk/dports/kde/skrooge/Portfile

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Feb 7, 2011, at 15:57, Marko Käning wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> Checksum change, but the change in source code didn't impact anything?
> Well, yes, I don't know what happened there. The checksum changed without any change in code, as far as I could see.

As far as I can tell, the checksums were never correct in the portfile. The distfile on their server has not been modified since January 24, which is before the portfile was committed.

$ curl -I http://skrooge.org/files/skrooge-0.8.0.4.tar.bz2
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:37:49 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.17 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.17 OpenSSL/0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 FrontPage/5.0.2.2635 mod_bwlimited/1.4 mod_auth_passthrough/2.1 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.8.8
Last-Modified: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:14:07 GMT
ETag: "1720003-80b3a0-49a9aba3c55c0"
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 8434592
Cache-Control: max-age=1209600
Expires: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:37:49 GMT
Vary: User-Agent
Content-Type: application/x-bzip2

The old distfile was not mirrored by any of our distfiles mirrors. (The distfile mirrors do not mirror a file if the checksums don't match.) The new file is now being mirrored.


>> Might want to use dist_subdir to avoid people who already have the distfile having bad checksums now.
> I never used this parameter so far. Looks like I have to look it up in the manual.


Given the above, I think it's unnecessary for today's situation, but for your future reference:

http://trac.macports.org/wiki/PortfileRecipes#stealth-updates