[75764] trunk/dports/kde/skrooge/Portfile

[Marko Käning]

On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:

> Checksum change, but the change in source code didn't impact anything?
> 
> Might want to use dist_subdir to avoid people who already have the distfile having bad checksums now.
> 

Why is that what you can do with dist_subdir, like this

---
dist_subdir     ${name}/${version}_${revision}
---

not standard MacPorts' behavior? Doing that by default would avoid the whole checksum trouble right from the start.

Am I mistaken?