[75764] trunk/dports/kde/skrooge/Portfile

Marko Käning MK-MacPorts at techno.ms
Fri Feb 11 12:55:10 PST 2011

On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:

> Checksum change, but the change in source code didn't impact anything?
> Might want to use dist_subdir to avoid people who already have the distfile having bad checksums now.

Why is that what you can do with dist_subdir, like this

dist_subdir     ${name}/${version}_${revision}

not standard MacPorts' behavior? Doing that by default would avoid the whole checksum trouble right from the start.

Am I mistaken?

More information about the macports-dev mailing list