MK-MacPorts at techno.ms
Fri Feb 11 12:55:10 PST 2011
On Feb 7, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
> Checksum change, but the change in source code didn't impact anything?
> Might want to use dist_subdir to avoid people who already have the distfile having bad checksums now.
Why is that what you can do with dist_subdir, like this
not standard MacPorts' behavior? Doing that by default would avoid the whole checksum trouble right from the start.
Am I mistaken?
More information about the macports-dev