port variants & conflicts

[Bradley Giesbrecht]

On Apr 29, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> 
> On Apr 29, 2012, at 16:19, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
> 
>> so in conclusion:
>> 
>> the way conflicts for variants is declared in the dovecot2 Porfile is
>> not correct and ought to be written as it is in the postfix Portfile.
> 
> Yes, you're right.
> 
> The conflicts in the mysql5 variant of the dovecot2 port (and the other database variants of that port, now that I look at them) are describing conflicts between *ports*. This is not usually done in a variant, and it doesn't look like that's what the author meant to do here either.
> 
> The conflicts in the mysql5 variant of the postfix port are describing conflicts between the *variants* of the postfix port. That's perfectly normal, and is probably what the author of the dovecot2 port meant to do there as well.

With regard to the dovecot2 conflicts they are intended to be variant conflicts and should be moved to the other side of the curly brace.
It is a bug in the dovecot2 Portfile.


Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20120429/24728442/attachment.bin>