[92477] trunk/dports/audio/pianobar/Portfile

Ryan Schmidt ryandesign at macports.org
Sun Apr 29 16:27:14 PDT 2012


On Apr 29, 2012, at 17:59, Joshua Root wrote:

> On 2012-4-30 08:30 , Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> 
>> On Apr 29, 2012, at 17:18, jmr at macports.org wrote:
>> 
>>> Revision: 92477
>>>         https://trac.macports.org/changeset/92477
>>> Author:   jmr at macports.org
>>> Date:     2012-04-29 15:18:51 -0700 (Sun, 29 Apr 2012)
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> pianobar: don't create a second port with the same name
>> 
>> I've already explained why I find it useful to do so, and I've yet to understand what problems doing so causes. Someone said portindex failure but I've never seen that.
> 
> As we told you before:
> <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33773>

I hadn't seen that ticket before.


> I see pure-mode.el for example is also not in the index.

Ok, I see what you mean. When I tested locally, before a port was added (or before its subports were added), I would use e.g. "sudo port install subport=pure-mode.el" so I didn't notice that it wasn't in the index properly. I don't understand why this prevents the subports from getting indexed, but I guess it doesn't matter; I'll fix the ports.


> Best case, the
> port gets indexed twice when you do this (and built twice on the buildbot).

Ok.

I guess then we'll eventually have to find another way to indicate to users what ports/subports it makes sense to install and which ones it doesn't.




More information about the macports-dev mailing list