Vincent Habchi vince at
Fri Dec 28 06:39:08 PST 2012

On 28 déc. 2012, at 15:28, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at> wrote:

> I don't know, and it looks inconvenient. And if the bindings build differently depending on how gmsh is built, then you really need to have the same variants in the bindings port as you do in the gmsh port, and to ensure that they match up with one another (for example using the active_variants portgroup).

How exactly do you use require_active_variants (I can’t seem to find any help)? You just append the ports and the procedure pulls in any variant present in the parameters but missing in the Portfile being built?


More information about the macports-dev mailing list