Fading zmq20

[Arno Hautala]

On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:41, Jeremy Lavergne
<jeremy at lavergne.gotdns.org> wrote:
>
> The "default" version that zmq would depend on could be a subport of the port it depends on, no? That'll make it easier to just move a line or two from the "default" portfile.

True, I was avoiding getting too far into implementation; trying to
stay at the hierarchy level.


On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:59, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> wrote:
>
> We shouldn't repeat the "perl5" antipattern any further. Perl should have been using "port select" all along; I don't know why it never did.
>
> However, there is talk of offering only perl 5.14 and deleting the others, so changes to the perl selection mechanism should perhaps wait until a decision on that is reached.

That's why I left it at "as with perl currently". I probably should
have just left that option off entirely, given what's been discussed.


-- 
arno  s  hautala    /-|   arno at alum.wpi.edu

pgp b2c9d448