[95512] trunk/dports/kde

[Joshua Root]

On 2012-7-20 13:25 , Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
>> Ah, ok. Since the mismatch of variants were making a "hidden" variant doc in these ports, with the fact that users having selected the +docs variant would not get what they asked, I considered that it was worth a revbump. Sorry if that was wrong.
> 
> I just consider it unnecessary because it's just documentation (rather than functionality) for software that isn't always the fastest build (if the archives aren't available for whatever set of variants were used).

I haven't looked at the details of this particular case, but please do
think through whether a rev bump will actually help before doing one.
For large ports, you are potentially wasting a lot of time and
electricity for a lot of people, after all.

If you're adding a variant for example, a rev bump isn't helpful because
just upgrading won't add anything to the port, the user has to actually
specify that they want the variant when they install.

- Josh