[91032] trunk/dports/lang/gcc47/Portfile

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Mar 22, 2012, at 19:06, Markus W. Weißmann wrote:

> On 22 Mar 2012, at 23:53, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> ...
> 
>> Therefore, the epoch needs to be increased.
>> 
>> Since increasing only the epoch is problematic for various reasons, increase the revision as well when you do this.
> 
> When the field "maintainer" includes the keyword "openmaintainer", you are explicitely allowed to fix this kind of problem right away. [1]
> 
> [1] https://trac.macports.org/wiki/SpecialMaintainerAddresses

I know you know I know I'm allowed to do that, but it should have been done by you as part of r91032. I mention it because this has been an issue every previous time you've updated a gcc port from its development series to its first final release. I've now made the change as part of r91245.