[91032] trunk/dports/lang/gcc47/Portfile

["Markus W. Weißmann"]

On 27 Mar 2012, at 09:09, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

> On Mar 22, 2012, at 19:06, Markus W. Weißmann wrote:
> 
>> On 22 Mar 2012, at 23:53, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> 
>>> ...
>> 
>>> Therefore, the epoch needs to be increased.
>>> 
>>> Since increasing only the epoch is problematic for various reasons, increase the revision as well when you do this.
>> 
>> When the field "maintainer" includes the keyword "openmaintainer", you are explicitely allowed to fix this kind of problem right away. [1]
>> 
>> [1] https://trac.macports.org/wiki/SpecialMaintainerAddresses
> 
> I know you know I know I'm allowed to do that, but it should have been done by you as part of r91032. I mention it because this has been an issue every previous time you've updated a gcc port from its development series to its first final release. I've now made the change as part of r91245.
> 

Thanks Ryan! :)