[97657] trunk/dports/lang

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Sep 14, 2012, at 04:41, Dan Ports wrote:

>> Hopefully a revbump of relevant ports was done after gcc46 dropped --enable-fully-dynamic-string, so we can just mine a followup commit from that change for a list of ports to bump.
> 
> Unfortunately, we didn't (as far as I know). gcc46 was failing to build
> on at least one platform, and unlike gcc45 it wasn't the default for
> building other ports, so it wasn't necessary then.

But gcc46 was an available variant of many ports, so users could have had ports installed with that variant, therefore all those ports should have received a revbump at that time.