supported_archs noarch & +universal

Joshua Root jmr at macports.org
Mon Sep 17 09:22:50 PDT 2012


On 2012-9-18 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
> Is "supported_archs noarch" and "+universal" mutually exclusive?

Yes, or at least it makes no sense to define a universal variant for a
noarch port.

> Should the automatic "+universal" variant be excluded by "supported_archs noarch"?

Yes, it is (for any supported_archs list with only one entry, in fact).

- Josh


More information about the macports-dev mailing list