supported_archs noarch & +universal

[Bradley Giesbrecht]

On Sep 17, 2012, at 9:22 AM, Joshua Root wrote:

> On 2012-9-18 01:56 , Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
>> Is "supported_archs noarch" and "+universal" mutually exclusive?
> 
> Yes, or at least it makes no sense to define a universal variant for a
> noarch port.
> 
>> Should the automatic "+universal" variant be excluded by "supported_archs noarch"?
> 
> Yes, it is (for any supported_archs list with only one entry, in fact).

Josh, thank you very much for heading me away from a wrong direction.

Archcheck and muniversal portgroups were being picked up by a subport and appearantly setting "supported_archs noarch" in the subport was overridden somewhere.

Moving the portgroups to a better location solved my problem.


Regards,
Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2763 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20120917/64c38f32/attachment.p7s>