wxWidgets vs. wxWidgets-devel: a proposal

[Titus von Boxberg]

Am 21.09.2012 19:52, schrieb Kuba Ober:
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>> 1. Are there any specific problems with wxWidgets 2.9 on older systems (what older systems)?
>>
>> 2.9 doesn't work on Tiger.
>
> My presumption is then that we want to keep things working on Tiger. This will require not only
> that wxWidgets28 is kept around, but that packages that shift to supporting *only* wxWidgets 2.9+ have
> to be forked into an explicit-version older package that's retained for those older systems to
> function. I'm OK with that.

I wouldn't recommend doing anything for 10.4.
That's too much work for an ancient platform that is not even directly
supported by macports.