[101435] trunk/dports/devel/subversion/Portfile

[Daniel J. Luke]

+1

My only real objection to Ryan making that commit is that I specifically chose to not make it 'openmaintainer' so that I at least get a ping before anyone makes any changes. The existing policy only has an escape for that in the case of something being broken (not building, security fix) in which case I usually would expect either a ping anyway or a commit from someone + a ping letting me know what they did and why.

Having a policy for obvious fixes seems like a good option too. 

In any case, I would have appreciated a note from Ryan about it.

On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Blair Zajac <blair at orcaware.com> wrote:
> We should have an obvious fix rule:
> 
> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/community-guide/roles.html#obvious-fix
> 
> Blair
> 
> On 01/11/2013 02:05 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> Pardon; I didn't think there would be any objection to fixing this obvious error in the previous commit.
>> 
>> On Jan 11, 2013, at 02:57, "Daniel J. Luke" <dluke at geeklair.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> subversion isn't an openmaintainer port, and this doesn't fix a broken build issue as far as I'm aware...

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
+========================================================+                        
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
+========================================================+                        
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
+========================================================+