[108496] trunk/dports/devel

[Jeremy Lavergne]

It's probably not an issue and he simply had a email rule set to flag improper use of the prefix ;-)

That being said, if you're going to patch a comment why not doing it for full correctness?

On Jul 25, 2013, at 2:31 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:

> I don't think it's an issue.
> 
> 1 - it's in a comment
> 2 - the unpatched file contains the path /home/breser/wandisco/svnrm-1.8/prefix/share/swig/2.0.9/perl5/perltypemaps.swg, which I'm sure most users don't have on their system ;-)
> 
> are you seeing a problem with the port in a prefix that isn't /opt/local?