[MacPorts] #39282: Submission: octopus

[David Strubbe]

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 6:04 AM, MacPorts <noreply at macports.org> wrote:

> #39282: Submission: octopus
> -------------------------+--------------------------------
>   Reporter:  dstrubbe@…  |      Owner:  macports-tickets@…
>       Type:  submission  |     Status:  new
>   Priority:  Normal      |  Milestone:
>  Component:  ports       |    Version:  2.1.3
> Resolution:              |   Keywords:
>       Port:  octopus     |
> -------------------------+--------------------------------
>
> Comment (by cal@…):
>
>  Replying to [comment:4 larryv@…]:
>  > - Using `active_variants` procs directly in variant scripts will cause
>  issues when MacPorts processes the Portfile on systems that don’t have the
>  pertinent ports present. See [https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail
>  /macports-dev/2013-June/023047.html this macports-dev post]. In short,
>  they need to be in a `pre-configure` script.
>
>  This only applies to `active_variants 1.0` and has been fixed in
>  `active_variants 1.1`. Please move `require_active_variants` out of the
>  pre-configure phase again.
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39282#comment:6>
> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
> Ports system for OS X
>

 Oh, thanks for the clarifcation. I have moved require_active_variants back
again, and it seems to work again. Does the Portfile look good now?

Thanks,
David
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20130621/c5f93202/attachment.html>