Octave Transition

[Takeshi Enomoto]

Michael,

>> Thank you for working on this.

I thank you, too.

> I imagine many users are using octave-devel right now, not because they want a development version, but because they want any version that works.

 I am one of them, but as a port maintainer-committer I know that
*-devel ports are unstable bleeding edge.

> I’m not sure I’d recommend adding a new octave-next port. That naming is nonstandard. Instead, can’t we just wait awhile, then update octave-devel to 3.7.x?

I agree with Ryan.

Takeshi