open tickets

[Daniel J. Luke]

Theoretically portmgr is the 'person or two' who should the process moving along ... if portmgr doesn't have enough time to deal with it, maybe we need new portmgr members? (I am not volunteering ;-) ).

On Oct 25, 2013, at 8:40 PM, Jeremy Lavergne <jeremy at lavergne.gotdns.org> wrote:
> It sounds like some sort of process needs to created.
> 
> Release has a process: does anything else though? Planning for release seems haphazard as does apparently getting commit access.
> 
> In addition to creating a process, it might be ideal to designate a person or two to ensure the process happens and moves along.
> 
> On Oct 25, 2013, at 18:13, Rainer Müller <raimue at macports.org> wrote:
>> My apologies that the commit request process takes that long. I was not
>> aware that our backlog of outstanding commit access requests now reaches
>> back so many months already. Sometimes we just do not come around to
>> review the requests we got, as checking contributions on both mailing
>> lists, Trac tickets, etc. can be a time consuming task. We usually try
>> to reach an agreement with multiple votes, which means more than just
>> one of us needs to do a review.

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
+========================================================+                        
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
+========================================================+                        
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
+========================================================+