[129502] trunk/dports/security

[Kurt Hindenburg]

On Dec 14, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> wrote:

> 
>> On Dec 14, 2014, at 11:59 AM, khindenburg at macports.org wrote:
> 
> This doesn't look sufficient. If pinentry support is automatically included simply because pinentry is installed, then the main (non-pinentry) port needs to be fixed not to use pinentry even if it is already installed.
> 
> Moreover, it seems strange to implement this as a subport instead of a variant. Unless a subport is a -devel subport, it's not supposed to conflict with the main port. Variants are typically used to enable optional features; pinentry support thus seems like a natural fit for a variant. What is the implication of having lastpass-cli built with pinentry support? I'm not really clear on what pinentry is.

My fault - I was under the impression we didn’t want to use variants anymore.  I’ll correct shortly.  pinentry is gnupg’s way to enter pin/password via dialogs.  

 Kurt