[129844] trunk/dports/multimedia/audacious-plugins/Portfile

[Daniel J. Luke]

> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:04 PM, Joshua Root <jmr at macports.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2014-12-23 04:35 , Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>> On 22.12.2014 06:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>> If I see a port foo at 1.2.3+bar, I should not have to wonder whether there is
>>> also a foo at 1.2.3, or whether the no-variant version is foo at 1.2.5 or
>>> whatever.
>> 
>> My case here is very much more simple.
>> 
>> Revbumping the whole audacious-plugins port would lead to useless rebuilds for
>> those not having the ffmpeg variant enabled. Even though one could state that
>> +ffmpeg is the default if +sdl2 wasn't selected (which it is not, by default)
>> and a "global" revbump would *maybe* have little overhead (i.e., affects only a
>> small number of -ffmpeg installations.)
> 
> Does the port in fact show up as outdated for people who have it
> installed with the rev-bumped variant?

for simplicity and consistency, it's probably worth a few 'useless rebuilds' to have this port conform to the existing standard

--
Daniel J. Luke                                                                   
+========================================================+                        
| *---------------- dluke at geeklair.net ----------------* |                          
| *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* |                          
+========================================================+                        
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |                          
|          reflect the opinions of my employer.          |                          
+========================================================+