[129844] trunk/dports/multimedia/audacious-plugins/Portfile

[Mihai Moldovan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 23.12.2014 01:04 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> On 2014-12-23 04:35 , Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>> On 22.12.2014 06:18 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
>>> If I see a port foo at 1.2.3+bar, I should not have to wonder whether there is
>>> also a foo at 1.2.3, or whether the no-variant version is foo at 1.2.5 or
>>> whatever.
>>
>> My case here is very much more simple.
>>
>> Revbumping the whole audacious-plugins port would lead to useless rebuilds for
>> those not having the ffmpeg variant enabled. Even though one could state that
>> +ffmpeg is the default if +sdl2 wasn't selected (which it is not, by default)
>> and a "global" revbump would *maybe* have little overhead (i.e., affects only a
>> small number of -ffmpeg installations.)
> 
> Does the port in fact show up as outdated for people who have it
> installed with the rev-bumped variant?

It did for me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=OEI2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----