libpgf Portfile

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Wednesday December 24 2014 15:07:40 Ryan Schmidt wrote:

Hi,

> Any port install will first try to upgrade dependencies.

Yeah, that's what I also realised thinking about it some more (and then saw it confirmed when `-n` had the intended effect).

> 
> Off the top of my head I don't see a problem with the way the version is declared in your preliminary libpgf Portfile, but perhaps there was the last time you ran portindex on it? Perhaps rerunning portindex would get the correct information into your index?

Yess, that was it. It's possible that I hadn't yet added a version number when I portindexed it, and never repeated the operation because that doesn't appear to be necessary for version bumps.

I'm wondering about the port, though. I saw that libpgf appears to be part of something called pgf which isn't the same thing already present as port:pgf . I hope there's no unwritten rule that states I should propose a port for the full monty, with libpgf a subport?

R.