Binary distributability of codeblocks: GPL & OpenSSL conflict

[Mojca Miklavec]

On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask if there is any chance to make Code::Blocks
> distributable and what would have to be done.
>
>> /opt/local/var/macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/tarballs/base/portmgr/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl -v codeblocks
>
> "codeblocks" is not distributable because its license "gpl" conflicts
> with license "OpenSSL" of dependency "openssl"
>
> Codeblocks depends on boost which further depends on openssl.
>
> A while ago it was apparently distributable – or at least one file
> exists in http://packages.macports.org/codeblocks/

Actually, something similar is true for ffmpeg as well:

"ffmpeg" is not distributable because its license "gpl" conflicts with
license "OpenSSL" of dependency "openssl"

http://packages.macports.org/ffmpeg/

Mojca