port upgrade outdated order
Brandon Allbery
allbery.b at gmail.com
Wed Mar 4 06:26:10 PST 2015
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:29 AM, René J.V. <rjvbertin at gmail.com> wrote:
> So to you it's OK if a port fails to build because it pulls in things from
> an earlier, installed version of itself that were not blocked because the
> feature was not enabled, and do so without as much as an explanation?
Port bugs are never OK. A diagnostic/debugging mode that is forced on in
some port as a hackaround for port bugs instead of fixing the port is
*also* never OK.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20150304/50fdac91/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list