port upgrade outdated order

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Wednesday March 04 2015 16:57:19 Mihai Moldovan wrote:

> > You have a lot of faith in this mode, and the extent to which it is possible to let it handle each and every case appropriately for each and every (potential) port out there.
> 
> Yes, we do. Because trace mode is doing the right thing™. Yes, the name

And you said something about being too dogmatic? O:-)

> P.S.: could you please fix your client to not always add "Undisclosed
> Recipients: ;"? I have to remove that every single time I answer to any
> of your posts.

I have no idea, I don't see anything in my kmail configuration that suggests it's adding that header or entry, nor do I see it in the headers of my sent messages.

R.