variant +foo description etc

[Rainer Müller]

On 2015-05-22 13:31, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Is there a reason why the parser doesn't bark when one declares a
> variant with a name that starts with a +? It took me a while to find
> that as the reason for a variant that seemingly didn't want to get
> set while `port info` showed it as a default variant ...

'port lint' already reports such a variant. However, it seems reasonable
to reject such a name completely.

http://trac.macports.org/changeset/136619

Rainer