variant +foo description etc

[René J.V. Bertin]

On Saturday May 23 2015 16:21:27 Rainer Müller wrote:

> 'port lint' already reports such a variant. However, it seems reasonable
> to reject such a name completely.

Exactly my point (I'd have resorted to port lint if I hadn't caught the error in my eyelashes before, it always takes me a while to realise I might want to use such tools. I'm not old enough to have caught the "lint reflex" :) )

> 
> http://trac.macports.org/changeset/136619

Thanks, works as expected.

R.