variant +foo description etc
René J.V. Bertin
rjvbertin at gmail.com
Sat May 23 07:40:58 PDT 2015
On Saturday May 23 2015 16:21:27 Rainer Müller wrote:
> 'port lint' already reports such a variant. However, it seems reasonable
> to reject such a name completely.
Exactly my point (I'd have resorted to port lint if I hadn't caught the error in my eyelashes before, it always takes me a while to realise I might want to use such tools. I'm not old enough to have caught the "lint reflex" :) )
Thanks, works as expected.
More information about the macports-dev