port:libclang
Chris Jones
jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
Wed Mar 9 05:16:40 PST 2016
Hi,
As far as I am aware ROOT6 does not offer any build option to use an
external clang installation. It always builds its own internal version,
and I would not be in favour of MacPorts changing this until such a time
as upstream offers it as an officially supported option. Not that I am
against a libClang, I can see the usefulness, but I don't really see
ROOT6 using it any time soon.
Chris
On 09/03/16 12:23, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> On 9 March 2016 at 13:13, René J.V. wrote:
>>
>> I have no idea how many (potential) ports (could) use and benefit from a port:libclang-x.y but would it be possible to create such (sub)ports?
>
> One potential port that comes to mind would be cling
> https://root.cern.ch/cling
> as dependency of (= part of) ROOT 6, but I would imagine that it would
> need quite a bit of effort before ROOT and/or cling could simply
> depend on "libclang". It's probably not easily doable at this very
> moment yet (but I don't know the details anyway).
>
> Mojca
> _______________________________________________
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev at lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
>
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list