[147088] trunk/dports

Takeshi Enomoto takeshi at macports.org
Sat Mar 26 23:53:49 PDT 2016


> Was this change made inadvertently? It does not appear to relate to revbumping ports that depend on netcdf.

I tried to move any changes unrelated to netcdf away,
but I must have left this.

> If this is a change you want made, the port's revision should be increased, since it changes the files the port installs.

The commit with netcdf rev bumps was a mistake but I believe it is worthwhile to instal this header so I will increase the revision.



Takeshi Enomoto
takeshi at macports.org

More information about the macports-dev mailing list