GitHub usernames in maintainers field

[Jeremy Sequoia]

There is also a list on https://trac.macports.org/wiki/MacPortsDevelopers

I'll probably do the ones from there if nobody beats me to it.

Sent from my iPhone...

> On Feb 11, 2017, at 15:05, Mojca Miklavec <mojca at macports.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 11 February 2017 at 23:25, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>> On Feb 11, 2017, at 13:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
>>>> On 11 February 2017 at 20:05, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote:
>>>> Do we have a mapping list somewhere, so we can just script this for known mappings?
>>> 
>>> The list should be available on our Trac (at least for those who
>>> logged in with their github account).
>> 
>> I assumed such a list would only be visible to our Trac sysadmins. Can it be seen by anyone logging in to Trac? If so, how?
> 
> Yes and no. One cannot get a list directly, but one can just enter the
> email in the CC field and it will suggest you which username belongs
> to that email. We don't have a list of all emails either, but that
> could be assembled from Portfiles without too much hassle and looked
> up one-by-one or scripted if someone really insisted.
> 
> I've been using that workaround to figure out whom to @mention on
> various pull requests.
> 
> I don't know if there are any security implications (provided that
> emails are public in Portfiles already). But probably this reveals
> emails from any GitHub user that ever logged in to our Trac as well,
> not just those of maintainers.
> 
> The old trac would hide full email addresses. Anyone logged in as
> committer would see full emails, I'm not sure if random newbies would
> also see full emails before the transition. I guess they do now.
> 
> My idea would be to get the "official list" from the sysadmins and do
> auto-replacement for all ports at the same time. Waiting for
> individual committers to do the changes will take forever and just
> means a lot of manual work + hundreds of commits (or hundreds of pull
> requests to be merged manually from maintainers without commit
> rights). Not to even mention all the typos, forgotten ports etc. (For
> that reason I would be in favour of keeping a single obfuscated list
> somewhere rather than duplicating all entries all over the place.
> Duplication is acceptable, but I really don't like manual work.)
> 
> Mojca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20170211/8d4ae4ac/attachment-0001.html>