question for the "base gurus"

[Brandon Allbery]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:10 AM, René J.V. Bertin <rjvbertin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Why yes indeed, but then the question becomes why the umask would
> sometimes get set to 0255. Does that sound like a value that base might use
> in certain conditions? I never use umask myself, one of those things I
> shoot myself in the foot with too easily.


There was at least one past bugfix where the code (for "install" of
directories, iirc?) was inappropriately using the umask directly.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20170125/d600c43f/attachment.html>