[macports-ports] branch master updated: wine ports: Blacklist macports-clang-* fallbacks
Ryan Schmidt
ryandesign at macports.org
Wed Mar 21 00:09:22 UTC 2018
> On Mar 20, 2018, at 18:57, Rainer Müller wrote:
>
> On 2018-03-21 00:02, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> diff --git a/x11/wine/Portfile b/x11/wine/Portfile
>> index 9a08944..539688e 100644
>> --- a/x11/wine/Portfile
>> +++ b/x11/wine/Portfile
>> @@ -239,7 +239,12 @@ compiler.blacklist-append macports-gcc-*
>>
>> if {[variant_isset universal]} {
>> # wine for 64-bit requires clang >= 3.8
>> - compiler.blacklist-append {clang < 800}
>> + compiler.blacklist-append {clang < 800} \
>> + macports-clang-3.3 \
>> + macports-clang-3.4 \
>> + macports-clang-3.5 \
>> + macports-clang-3.6 \
>> + macports-clang-3.7 \
>> }
>>
>> platform darwin {
>>
> This is now still picking up gcc-apple-4.2 on OS X 10.8
Then blacklist it.
> and it is getting tedious to find a solution by committing for the buildbot.
If you don't have a local system to test on, then committing and checking buildbot results is the only alternative available today.
> Normally I would not bother to fix unsupported systems, but this time I am also the one who broke it... ;-)
> Do we have any better way to specify the need for clang >= 3.8?
No; the above is currently the correct way to do it. It will be a little simpler if we implement https://trac.macports.org/ticket/56093.
> I tried setting compiler.whitelist as well, but it only lead me to the "All compilers are either blacklisted or unavailable" message.
Generally, do not use compiler.whitelist. Use compiler.blacklist instead, and if all compilers are then blacklisted, add a suitable alternative to compiler.fallback.
> If there is no way, we should probably just disable the 64-bit build of wine for macOS <= 10.8.
Obviously if there is *no way* to build it on older systems then you have to prevent it. But it does not sound like it is impossible at this point, so please don't do that yet.
More information about the macports-dev
mailing list