Gsoc 18 Project | Collect build statistics

Vishnu vishnum1998 at gmail.com
Sun May 6 10:22:00 UTC 2018


Hello

Sorry for being inactive.
Had back to back exams .

Got free today.

I implemented a new search feature in my app .
Pushed the changes to heroku too.
Please go through :
sleepy-wave-33400.herokuapp.com/port/

There you can search any port with its name.
Even just starting few characters would work.

Thanks

On 30 April 2018 at 23:30, Mojca Miklavec <mojca at macports.org> wrote:

> On 30 April 2018 at 18:47, Jackson Isaac wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Vishnu wrote:
> >> Hey
> >>
> >> Repository names:
> >> MacPorts-features?
> >> Macportsinfo?
> >> Or just simple
> >> gsoc18?
>
> No, gsoc18 is a bad name since the idea is to use the project
> afterwards as well and I don't like to rename it two years from now.
> (We can decide to rename it one month from now, but not once people
> start forking it etc.)
>
> > I was thinking about macports-portstatistics or macports-portstats.
>
> Or "macports-portinfo" as something inbetween? I'm somewhat reluctant
> about "stat[istics]" because it's about much more than statistics.
>
> >> And also in the long term. Parser would be run only once in forever or
> say a
> >> year.
>
> No way. Parser needs to be run after each commit. Initially it could
> be once per hour or so to simplify things and avoid hooks etc., but in
> the long term it needs to be run immediately after GitHub notifies you
> about the update.
>
> >> And before running the original db must be cleared.
> >>
> >> And then obvious question arise. What if a new port is added in
> macports.
> >
> > You are on a right path I would say. We would want it to update after
> > every port is added/updated
> > and built.
>
> Indeed, if a new port is added, you need to update the database. More
> important: also if a port is removed or if version changes etc.
>
> >> For that i would like to know the mechanics of new port addition.
>
> See one of recent pull requests:
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1694/files
>
> This commit will create a new Portfile with four subports
> (py-waitress, py27-waitress, py35-waitress, py36-waitress), update a
> bunch of existing ports and add a bunch of new subports to existing
> Portfiles (py35-paste, py36-paste, ...)
>
> We could at the same time declare a few ports obsolete or delete some.
>
> You get all that info from Portindex (it could be useful if we could
> get some kind of "differential Portindex"; I'm not absolutely sure how
> port deletions are handled).
>
> >> I think before the new port is added. It is obviously built before
> right?
>
> No. It is first added. Only once it is added it can be built on the
> buildbot (a commit to repository triggers a build on the buildbot).
>
> >> So
> >> maybe we can add some code there to update the table with a row when new
> >> port is added.
> >
> > When a port is submitted, it is built by Travis CI and also our
> > buildbots,
>
> Travis only builds pull requests, not actually commits.
>
> > which builds
> > the port for mac 10.6 to 10.13 versions and gives the build status. We
> > would be more
> > interested in the status provided by the buildbot.
>
> I would ignore Travis builds for now anyway. It could be interesting
> to add pointers to open pull requests for a particular port, but not
> right now. Evidently your code needs to first update the database to
> get the list of all new ports, information about successful or failed
> builds would come later from the buildbot.
>
> > There could be a trigger or a listener which runs whenever a build job
> > is initiated and then
> > updates the DB on completion. I believe there would be some mechanism
> > to know the status
> > of each job.
>
> You can access the API from the buildbot to ask for status. But if you
> don't have an entry for a particular port first, you might run into
> troubles if you'll want to add build results without being able to
> reference a port with that name.
>
> > Maybe someone more familiar with buildbot could share some insights ?
>
> In any case it would make a lot more sense to start with tens of
> thousands old builds first and only once that is done add the latest
> information as soon as it's available. There is a high chance that
> things will change if we switch to buildbot version one (which might
> happen in the meantime).
>
> Mojca
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20180506/b31a4288/attachment.html>


More information about the macports-dev mailing list