legacy-support and Wayland

Chris Jones jonesc at hep.phy.cam.ac.uk
Fri Sep 27 08:45:50 UTC 2019


Not really sure what you are asking. legacy-support package is blind to 
what ports might be using it. It just supplies functionality missing on 
older OSes. If some hypothetical future wayland port needs these 
functions, it presumably could use the PG in the same way as everything 
else does.

Chris

On 27/09/2019 9:32 am, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> A quick question to the legacy-support devs: do you have any interest in whether or not these support functions (plus whatever else is needed and doable) could help building Wayland for Mac?
> 
> FWIW, I brought up the idea of running Wayland with Jeremy H. back when he was still maintaining XQuartz, and he was very positive about the idea (including how it could improve X11 support - there's some sort of X11 server "backend" for Wayland).
> 
> Proper Wayland support on Mac should also provide a more modern (and better integrated) platform for traditional Unix apps, possibly even for KDE/KF5 as an eco-system without need for patching Qt.
> 
> R.
> 


More information about the macports-dev mailing list