new naming scheme for llvm/clang will cause wreckage fyi

[Ken Cunningham]

proposed new naming scheme for llvm & clang 10+ as prev discussed. explanation why in PR. Up to group, but will affect everything if it goes through. I'm fine either way, leave  naming pattern as is or change it. Once in, no going back...

see <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60169>

K
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20200420/03e1bac5/attachment.html>