new naming scheme for llvm/clang will cause wreckage fyi

[Fred Wright]

On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Ken Cunningham wrote:

> proposed new naming scheme for llvm & clang 10+ as prev discussed. 
> explanation why in PR. Up to group, but will affect everything if it 
> goes through. I'm fine either way, leave naming pattern as is or change 
> it. Once in, no going back...
>
> see <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60169>

I thought that the naming scheme change involved how the version suffixing 
is handled, but I don't see how that relates to the ticket referenced 
here.

Fred Wright