new naming scheme for llvm/clang will cause wreckage fyi

[Ken Cunningham]

> On Mon, 20 Apr 2020, Ken Cunningham wrote:
> 
> > proposed new naming scheme for llvm & clang 10+ as prev discussed. 
> > explanation why in PR. Up to group, but will affect everything if it 
> > goes through. I'm fine either way, leave naming pattern as is or change 
> > it. Once in, no going back...
> >
> > see <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/60169>
> 
> I thought that the naming scheme change involved how the version suffixing 
> is handled, but I don't see how that relates to the ticket referenced 
> here.
> 
> Fred Wright

Fred, you are so right. I meant to paste in the URL to the PR, but i guess somehow had that ticket URL loaded instead and pasted a URL to something else.

Apologies. Please see:

https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/6902

Ken
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macports.org/pipermail/macports-dev/attachments/20200420/b8e59305/attachment.html>