[MacPorts] #12710: perl5 portgroup should be able to write in
privlib dir for the bundled modules
MacPorts
trac at macosforge.org
Sun Jan 27 04:29:49 PST 2008
#12710: perl5 portgroup should be able to write in privlib dir for the bundled
modules
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: nox at macports.org | Owner: macports-tickets at lists.macosforge.org
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone: MacPorts base enhancements
Component: base | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Comment (by vinc17 at macports.org):
Replying to [comment:10 nox at macports.org]:
> Nope. Perl core needs the getopt-long module. So we can't remove it
> from perl5.8 files. Except if we do that in a post-destroot stage,
> but that would be more of a workaround than a real bugfix.
Yes, I meant at this stage. And I don't see this as a workaround.
> As narf_tm said, that would be too difficult to maintain, even though
> updates are not released __that__ often.
Actually, I find it '''easier''' to maintain. Otherwise one has the
following problem: Assume that some module M provided by the Perl core
gets updated separately by upstream and a new port is added for this
module to use this new version (as what happened for the getopt-long
module). Then all the ports that use this module should be updated to
depend on this new port (providing the new version of M). With the meta-
port solution, ports using Perl could depend only on the meta-port and
would not need to be updated whenever a new port providing a core module
is added.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/12710#comment:11>
MacPorts </projects/macports>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list