[MacPorts] #16981: openvrml-0.17.11: new port
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Thu Mar 19 12:34:44 PDT 2009
#16981: openvrml-0.17.11: new port
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: raphael@… | Owner: macports-tickets@…
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Submissions
Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0
Keywords: vrml new port | Port: openvrml
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment(by braden@…):
Replying to [comment:26 devans@…]:
> >
> > These comments--taken from a posting to the openvrml-develop mailing
list--apply to '''trunk''' OpenVRML; the situation with the 0.17.''x''
series can be expected to be significantly worse. (Note that OpenVRML
0.17.''x'' doesn't even have a file named `parse_vrml.cpp`.)
>
> Yes, I misquoted the file name. The file where I'm having trouble is
vrml97node.cpp.
>
> >
> >
> > Is this from compiling trunk OpenVRML or 0.17.''x''?
>
> 0.17.11 using the Portfile under development in this ticket. If you
like, I'll give it a try using your
> trunk code.
Please do try the trunk. `vrml97node.cpp` has been completely broken up on
the trunk and should no longer pose a problem.
> > I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if nothing else in MacPorts
includes Spirit grammars nearly as large as OpenVRML's.
>
> I'm sure that's true. I'm just concerned that the amount of resources
necessary to build this port successfully
> may put off some people who would otherwise adopt it. I know you've put
a lot of work into this problem
> and I hope you'll continue to do so.
The Spirit grammars get compiled in `browser.cpp` in 0.17.''x''; on the
trunk that has been broken out into `parse_vrml.cpp`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/16981#comment:27>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list