[MacPorts] #39619: Submission gnome-chemistry-utils

MacPorts noreply at macports.org
Wed Jul 3 01:04:25 PDT 2013


#39619: Submission gnome-chemistry-utils
------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
  Reporter:  c.herbig@…             |      Owner:  macports-tickets@…
      Type:  submission             |     Status:  new
  Priority:  Normal                 |  Milestone:
 Component:  ports                  |    Version:  2.1.3
Resolution:                         |   Keywords:  science chemistry gnome
      Port:  gnome-chemistry-utils  |
------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by ryandesign@…):

 Replying to [comment:3 c.herbig@…]:
 > Replying to [comment:2 ryandesign@…]:
 > > The port says "supported_archs x86_64 i386". So it definitely does not
 work on PowerPC?
 > I have absolutely no idea, and I don't have a PPC mac to test it...

 Then you should not presume it won't work. Just omit the supported_archs
 line to let the default (all archs are supported) take effect. If it turns
 out not to work on PowerPC, users will bug us about it, and we can address
 it then.

 > > You've attached a second portfile, of goffice. We already have a port
 of goffice. If you're proposing to update the goffice port in some way,
 file a new ticket, and attach a unified diff of your changes to it. First
 consult any existing open tickets about goffice to see if they relate.
 > Now here we have a real problem.  I forgot that I had been using an
 updated gnumeric and therefore goffice in a local repository, and that
 MacPorts still has 0.8.x.  They had attempted to update it before, but had
 to drop it back down because anything above goffice 0.8.x breaks GnuCash
 (r91843).  So after submitting this, I realized if anyone wanted to try
 it, they would need the updated office 0.10.x portfile, which gnome-
 chemistry-utils requires.  It seems that Fedora deals with the problem by
 making a separate goffice08 dependency for GnuCash, perhaps someone can
 take a look at doing that?

 That sounds reasonable, and not difficult to accomplish, since there are
 only two ports currently depending on goffice.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39619#comment:4>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X


More information about the macports-tickets mailing list