[MacPorts] #43917: ROOT6 : Update to first production release, 6.00.00
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Fri Jun 6 07:26:20 PDT 2014
#43917: ROOT6 : Update to first production release, 6.00.00
-----------------------+---------------------------------
Reporter: jonesc@… | Owner: mojca@…
Type: update | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch maintainer
Port: root6 |
-----------------------+---------------------------------
Comment (by mojca@…):
Replying to [comment:49 jonesc@…]:
> Replying to [comment:48 mojca@…]:
> > Yes, I changed it. Because from what I uderstand `[info exists
configure.cxx_stdlib]` is always true since MacPorts 2.3.
>
> But is it then correct to *always* require /usr/lib/libc++.dylib is
present, which is what it now does ?
>
> I thought the idea of using the libc++ port was to use that as an
alternative when it was not available ? Or does that port actually provide
this library ?
I guess you are right. All that the `libcxx` port provides on my system is
a `README` file with
{{{
libcxx is an empty port on this OS version because the functionality is
already provided by the OS.
}}}
I'll remove the part with `pre-fetch` and see what happens on 10.6.
> If also black listing macports clang 3.3 means 3.4 is then used, is this
not a solution, or does it lead to other problems ?
It shouldn't lead to other problems. And I plan to do just that (on the
other hand it seems a bit unfair to blacklist 3.3 as that compiler works
in principle, it's just that 3.4 should probably be the preferred one).
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43917#comment:52>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for OS X
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list