[MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sun Nov 12 15:50:41 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Next message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
#55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96,
postgresql10: universal variant fails
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: postgresql92, postgresql93, |
postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, |
postgresql10 |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by ryandesign):
I have verified that postgresql90 and postgresql91 build universal already
so they're not affected by the problem I was reporting. However, I don't
know if the changes you're proposing would be of benefit to them anyway.
Having a single postgresql port would not be ideal. Users need to be able
to choose when and if they upgrade their database servers to a new
version. MacPorts has always offered multiple versions of database
servers.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55303#comment:3>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
- Previous message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Next message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list