[MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
MacPorts
noreply at macports.org
Sun Nov 12 15:55:40 UTC 2017
- Previous message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Next message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
#55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96,
postgresql10: universal variant fails
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: ryandesign | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Normal | Milestone:
Component: ports | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Port: postgresql92, postgresql93, |
postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, |
postgresql10 |
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by mf2k):
Replying to [comment:2 MarcusCalhoun-Lopez]:
> Even limiting PostgreSQL to the
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PostgreSQL#Release_history five versions]
supported upstream would be helpful.
I fully agree that we should only be supporting versions that are
supported upstream. Security issues will not be addressed by the
unmaintained versions.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/55303#comment:4>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
- Previous message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Next message: [MacPorts] #55303: postgresql92, postgresql93, postgresql94, postgresql95, postgresql96, postgresql10: universal variant fails
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the macports-tickets
mailing list