zoarre.37258548 at bloglines.com
Tue Feb 13 19:00:01 PST 2007
In article <79F73050-B405-49F0-B219-2EC802AD5C59 at macports.org>,
Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign at macports.org> wrote:
> I don't understand this idea. Some ports don't have variants and
> don't need any. Say, the readline port. It has no variants. It
> depends on no other packages. Its configure line features no --with-
> foo or --enable-foo flags. What meaningful variants would you suggest
> adding to this port, for example?
i hadn't considered variant-less ports, so my speculation that there
would be no variant-less ports is in error. if there aren't any
available variants, then there's only one possible signature and there's
no ambiguity between the variant-less signature and the signature of
default variant set-- they are one in the same.
More information about the macports-users