Kerberos5 depends on gnupg but not gnupg2

Tabitha McNerney tabithamc at gmail.com
Sun Jul 22 15:56:47 PDT 2007


On 7/22/07, Yves de Champlain <yves at macports.org> wrote:
>
>
> Le 07-07-22 à 04:43, Tabitha McNerney a écrit :
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > As I was reviewing and auditing my MacPorts dependency chain, I
> > realized that the kerberos5 port depends on gnupg. However, gnupg
> > seems to be a bit ancient and I would think deprecated by gnupg2.
> > Would that be my imagination or is there a good reason to continue
> > having kerberos5 depending on gnupg? Or is there a successor in
> > MacPorts to kerberos5 which I may be unaware of?
>
> This port is 2 years-old.
>
> I created it only because kerberos was not available on Darwin OS but
> have not been using Darwin OS since darwin 8.
>
> feel free to modify it as you like.


Yves, great, I'll see if I can get the Portfile to use gnupg2 instead of
gnupg. Is the kerberos5 MacPort not really used much by anyone now? I see
that Apple now includes a Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) in Mac OS X
Server (I think starting with 10.3 - Panther) which might suffice for most
people, although some of the MacPorts can be built with the "kerberos"
variant which then indeed depends on the kerberos5 MacPort having been
installed. I see there is also an implementation of Kerberos which is
available in MacPorts as the heimdal port. Do most in the MacPorts community
now have a preference for the heimdal port over the kerberos5 port?

Thanks,

T.M.

yves
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20070722/717a1061/attachment.html


More information about the macports-users mailing list