boost 1.34 porting question
ryandesign at macports.org
Sat Jun 9 01:06:55 PDT 2007
On Jun 9, 2007, at 02:19, Sancho McCann wrote:
> The previous portfile for the boost 1.33.1 port stripped off the
> version information from the library names
> (libboost_program_options-1_33_1.dylib would become
> libboost_program_options.dylib or something like that). Is this the
> preferred result of the installation/activation? If so, I'll have
> the 1.34.0 port do the same.
I've never seen any port that does that before. I don't know why it's
done in the boost port. Check "svn log", "svn blame", look up boost
tickets in Trac, etc.; see if you can track it down.
More information about the macports-users