mplayer revision try3
Eric Cronin
ecronin at gizmolabs.org
Sat Jun 30 09:26:37 PDT 2007
On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Emmanuel Hainry wrote:
> Citando Boey Maun Suang :
>> Hi Emmanuel,
>>
>>> Yesterday, port -v outdated informed me that there was a "new"
>>> version of MPlayer available:
>>>
>>> Mplayer 1.0rc1_4 > 1.0rc1_try3 !
>>
>> The revision field in Portfiles is only supposed to be used for
>> updates or
>> fixes to the Portfile that don't involve upstream changes, and
>> furthermore
>> is only intended to contain positive integer values. In this
>> case, the
>> Portfile should have been altered from:
>>
>> version 1.0rc1
>> revision 4
>>
>> to:
>>
>> version 1.0rc1try3
>>
>> (i.e. the revision number should have been removed; it should
>> default to 0).
>>
>> Eric, would you be able to make this change? I don't think that
>> it will
>> muck up the revisioning, since the version comparison algorithm
>> used in
>> MacPorts will report 1.0rc1 < 1.0rc1try3. I suspect that
>> Emmanuel had to
>> force MacPorts to upgrade Mplayer in the first instance, as his
>> output
>> indicates that MacPorts thought on the basis of the strings that the
>> installed version is newer than the "updated" version, so not
>> many users
>> will have installed the current version in the tree (including
>> myself :P ).
my bad here... I was trying to do the minimal amount of hacking to
deal with MPlayer's stupid non-versions. My testing didn't turn up
any cases where revision was expected to be numerical, and 't' is >
'4' so it did correctly detect as being newer.
>
>>> PS: * the upgrade did not go perfectly, I had to change the
>>> Portfile to
>>> revert the dependency on lzo instead of lzo2. I will put a ticket on
>>> track.
>>
>> Not sure about this one. Eric, I suppose it's over to you!
>
> It is almost resolved:
> http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/12196 . It is
> more or
> less my bad for not deinstalling lzo after installing lzo2.
Not really your fault, I had the -I ordering wrong. But since almost
nothing needs lzo1 most people should uninstall it once they
upgrade. Could someone apply the change in that ticket and commit?
Thanks,
Eric
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 478 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/attachments/20070630/b88e6153/PGP.bin
More information about the macports-users
mailing list