libIDL woes

William Davis frstan at bellsouth.net
Thu Feb 7 00:39:14 PST 2008


On Feb 6, 2008, at 8:17 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

>
> On Feb 6, 2008, at 19:12, David Rowe wrote:
>
>> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> The libidl bug is a different and unrelated bug. libidl is  
>>> unmaintained so someone will have to volunteer to figure out  
>>> what's breaking, and how to fix it. Actually, Tod Morrison just  
>>> posted in the bug that he found a reason why it's failing, and a  
>>> workaround, but not yet a fix that we can apply to the portfile.
>>
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> I am not agitating on this one as the ports I am using still seem  
>> to work with the earlier version of libIDL that is still installed.
>>
>> Thanks to all for their efforts
>
> Daniel committed r33828 earlier today to solve this issue.
>
> _______________________________________________
> macports-users mailing list
> macports-users at lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

solved it for me!
thanks Daniel!

William Davis
frstanATbellsouthDOTnet
Mac OS X.5.1 Darwin 9.1.0
XQuartz 2.1.3 - (xorg-server 1.3.0-apple9)
Mac Mini Intel Duo @ 1.86 GHz

Mundus vult decepi, ego non



More information about the macports-users mailing list