libIDL woes

[Ryan Schmidt]

On Feb 6, 2008, at 19:12, David Rowe wrote:

> Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> The libidl bug is a different and unrelated bug. libidl is  
>> unmaintained so someone will have to volunteer to figure out  
>> what's breaking, and how to fix it. Actually, Tod Morrison just  
>> posted in the bug that he found a reason why it's failing, and a  
>> workaround, but not yet a fix that we can apply to the portfile.
>
> Thanks for the reply.
> I am not agitating on this one as the ports I am using still seem  
> to work with the earlier version of libIDL that is still installed.
>
> Thanks to all for their efforts

Daniel committed r33828 earlier today to solve this issue.