Is "MacPort" a valid term?

[Kendall Shaw]

On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:43 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2008, at 11:51 PM, markd at macports.org wrote:
> 
> > So are you saying that you think "MacPort" is a valid term?  I was
> > thinking it wasn't an accepted and/or used term.  If folks think it  
> > is, I
> > can stop flipping between using "MacPorts port" (mostly in intro  
> > parts)
> > and "port" in the docs.  It's not a really big deal though, except  
> > just to
> > settle if the term "MacPort" is considered invalid usage or not.
> 
> I'm not saying it's invalid, how about that? :-)
> 
> Ultimately, I think it's like a nickname.  You generally don't get to  
> pick your own nickname and, whether you like it or not, once you have  
> one it sticks to you like glue for the rest of your life.
> 
> We're still just in that awkward phase where nobody has found a  
> nickname that really applies to the extent where everyone goes "Yes!   
> That's it!" and then continues to use that name regardless of what the  
> Powers That Be attempt to call it.

How about: Mmmm... port?